From: | Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: n_ins_since_vacuum stats for aborted transactions |
Date: | 2025-04-09 18:31:55 |
Message-ID: | CAA5RZ0u1pN4Xi3PeZFDAt8OpPzkJ4FkS1GnN3KSHzWTHGsa5Kw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> This is *not* an oversight. It is by design. See commit b07642dbcd8d. The
> documentation says
I don't see in the commit message why inserts in an aborted transaction
must count towards n_ins_since_vacuum.
> Estimated number of rows inserted since this table was last vacuumed
>
> Those rows were actually inserted. They are physically in the data files. And
> that's what matters for the autovacuum algorithm.
Correct,but they are dead tuples that are physically in the files, and
are accounted for through
n_dead_tup and are then cleaned up based on the
autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor|threshold
calculation.
The purpose of b07642dbcd8d is to trigger autovacuum for append only/mainly
workloads that don't generate dead tuples.
--
Sami Imseih
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jacob Champion | 2025-04-09 18:41:39 | Re: Adding support for SSLKEYLOGFILE in the frontend |
Previous Message | Euler Taveira | 2025-04-09 18:07:19 | Re: n_ins_since_vacuum stats for aborted transactions |