> Forget original purpose, is there presently a bug or not?
Yes, there is a bug. Accounting rows inserted as part of an aborted
transaction in
n_ins_since_vacuum is not correct, since the same rows are being
accounted for with n_dead_tup.
> Between the two options the one where we count dead tuples makes more sense on its face.
IIUC, I am saying the same thing, if an inserted row is rolled back,
it should only count as a
dead tuple (n_dead_tup) only, and not in n_ins_since_vacuum.
--
Sami Imseih
Amazon Web Services (AWS)