From: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation |
Date: | 2025-01-21 02:51:51 |
Message-ID: | CAHut+PvC4uPabeGMvDuTQ4S+5eX66Y6+tU5QMRmB2jDw-Cj2Cw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Some review comments for patch v61-0001.
======
src/backend/replication/slot.c
InvalidatePossiblyObsoleteSlot:
1.
/*
* Check if the slot needs to be invalidated. If it needs to be
- * invalidated, and is not currently acquired, acquire it and mark it
- * as having been invalidated. We do this with the spinlock held to
- * avoid race conditions -- for example the restart_lsn could move
- * forward, or the slot could be dropped.
+ * invalidated, and is already ours, mark it as having been
+ * invalidated; otherwise, acquire it first and then mark it as having
+ * been invalidated. We do this with the spinlock held to avoid race
+ * conditions -- for example the restart_lsn could move forward, or
+ * the slot could be dropped.
*/
Can't you just word this as "mark it as invalidated" (which you do
later anyway) instead of "mark is as having been invalidated"? (this
is in two places).
~~~
2.
+ /*
+ * The logical replication slots shouldn't be invalidated as GUC
+ * max_slot_wal_keep_size is set to -1 during the binary upgrade.
+ * See check_old_cluster_for_valid_slots() where we ensure that no
+ * invalidated before the upgrade.
+ */
+ Assert(!(*invalidated && SlotIsLogical(s) && IsBinaryUpgrade));
2a.
I know this sentence was the same before you moved it, but "ensure
that no invalidated" seems like there are some words missing.
2b.
TBH, I this part confused me (the code is repeated in a couple of
places). AFAICT the code/comment does not match quite right. The
comment refers to a setting that is "during binary upgrade", yet the
Assert can only pass if IsBinaryUpgrade is false. (??)
I'm unsure of the intent; perhaps it should be like:
if (IsBinaryUpgrade)
Assert(!(*invalidated && SlotIsLogical(s)));
======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2025-01-21 02:55:05 | Re: Statistics Import and Export |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2025-01-21 02:45:14 | Re: Update Unicode data to Unicode 16.0.0 |