From: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Önder Kalacı <onderkalaci(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: doc: clarify the limitation for logical replication when REPILICA IDENTITY is FULL |
Date: | 2023-07-17 03:17:40 |
Message-ID: | CAHut+PupHavaYqxij+UwkXoYT_YJKzSaX7TNBaW+-Zwc034TrA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 2:10 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 2:15 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
> <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > > > I think it's appropriate to add on the restrictions page. (But mentioning that this
> > > restriction is only for subscriber)
> > > >
> > > > If the list were larger, then the restrictions page could be divided into publisher
> > > and subscriber restrictions. But not for one very specific restriction.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Okay, how about something like: "The UPDATE and DELETE operations
> > > cannot be applied on the subscriber for the published tables that
> > > specify REPLICA IDENTITY FULL when the table has attributes with
> > > datatypes (e.g point or box) that don't have a default operator class
> > > for Btree or Hash. This won't be a problem if the table has a primary
> > > key or replica identity defined for it."?
> >
> > Thanks for discussing and giving suggestions. But it seems that the first
> > sentence is difficult to read for me. How about attached?
> >
>
> The last line seems repetitive to me. So, I have removed it. Apart
> from that patch looks good to me. Sergie, Peter, and others, any
> thoughts?
The v5 patch LGTM.
------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Rowley | 2023-07-17 03:18:30 | Re: unrecognized node type while displaying a Path due to dangling pointer |
Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2023-07-17 02:37:28 | Re: ALTER TABLE SET ACCESS METHOD on partitioned tables |