From: | Ramesh naik <ramesh(dot)esl(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Azimuddin Mohammed <azimeiu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Replication mode |
Date: | 2018-01-11 02:19:56 |
Message-ID: | CAH=dj08jOcMt+UuGOtSya4uBtaCM+65Oyj4mu12bNp=Tx0Vr7A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Hi Azim,
Pgpool is not of SPOF. You can use watchdog feature in PgPool-II to achieve
HA.
I’ve used it before. I didn’t find any difficulties in configuring or
managing
FYI..
http://www.pgpool.net/docs/latest/en/html/runtime-watchdog-config.html
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 at 9:11 AM, Azimuddin Mohammed <azimeiu(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> :-)
> Our fear is using open source tools for HA creates dependency and single
> point of failure(pgpool). Or say pacemaker which our enterprise do not
> recommend.
> We are planning to use postgres to use for our hadoop metastore which is
> presently on Oracle.
>
>
> On Jan 10, 2018 6:21 PM, "Mark Kirkwood" <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>
> wrote:
>
>> On 11/01/18 13:08, Azimuddin Mohammed wrote:
>>
>> Thanks mark..
>>> That does help...
>>> Our db is not transactional ..it more of write few times read many times
>>> ..What HA do you recommend for us by not using any open source
>>> tools...and what could be the best backup startegy...
>>>
>>>
>> Wow - that 'not using any open source tools' restriction pretty much
>> rules out any options I'd come up with (was that *really* what you meant to
>> write - Postgres is after all open source too...)?
>>
>> regards
>>
>> Mark
>>
> --
Regards,
Ramesh Naik E
+65 8202 7519
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jerry Sievers | 2018-01-11 02:24:29 | pg_receivexlog only captures WAL data, not *.backup? |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2018-01-11 01:59:27 | Re: Replication mode |