| From: | Azimuddin Mohammed <azimeiu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Replication mode |
| Date: | 2018-01-11 01:10:40 |
| Message-ID: | CAKUuFd6A0kCHQLi6sPUUUJ-_nB1mJOHaNRaG-vRtZQgr8w0-iw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
:-)
Our fear is using open source tools for HA creates dependency and single
point of failure(pgpool). Or say pacemaker which our enterprise do not
recommend.
We are planning to use postgres to use for our hadoop metastore which is
presently on Oracle.
On Jan 10, 2018 6:21 PM, "Mark Kirkwood" <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>
wrote:
> On 11/01/18 13:08, Azimuddin Mohammed wrote:
>
> Thanks mark..
>> That does help...
>> Our db is not transactional ..it more of write few times read many times
>> ..What HA do you recommend for us by not using any open source
>> tools...and what could be the best backup startegy...
>>
>>
> Wow - that 'not using any open source tools' restriction pretty much rules
> out any options I'd come up with (was that *really* what you meant to write
> - Postgres is after all open source too...)?
>
> regards
>
> Mark
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2018-01-11 01:37:07 | Re: Replication mode |
| Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2018-01-11 00:21:55 | Re: Replication mode |