| From: | Dusan Misic <promisic(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rohit Coder <passionate_programmer(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Why PGSQL has no developments in the .NET area? |
| Date: | 2011-10-03 16:26:00 |
| Message-ID: | CAGdZ+NAAS2PhuzhGo6a5g8ewKUH7=8J3fYM_ZropOtjcCbZAOA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
I do not understand what you mean by the term sluggish?
Every .NET driver has some overhead when you first load it, and then it is
being cached into memory.
I have used Npgsql and it worked great for me.
If you are not satisfied with Npgsql, try Devarts connector.
On Oct 2, 2011 5:33 AM, "Rohit Coder" <passionate_programmer(at)hotmail(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> PgSQL has just one old NPGSQL driver for .NET, which is itself sluggish.
The ODBC driver works better as compared to NPGSQL, but I suspect the ODBC
driver is not the right choice for ORM framework of .NET.
>
> I want to know whether there is any efficient .NET provider and is PGSQL
compatible with the .NET entity framework.
>
> Regards,
> Rohit.
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Travers | 2011-10-03 16:46:21 | Re: Why PGSQL has no developments in the .NET area? |
| Previous Message | mgould | 2011-10-03 16:13:44 | Re: Why PGSQL has no developments in the .NET area? |