Re: Why PGSQL has no developments in the .NET area?

From: <mgould(at)isstrucksoftware(dot)net>
To: francisco(at)npgsql(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Rohit Coder" <passionate_programmer(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Why PGSQL has no developments in the .NET area?
Date: 2011-10-03 16:13:44
Message-ID: 20111003091344.c760ddbd7c0975bc4b045766db7d895c.3a204f1a72.wbe@email16.secureserver.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general









The Ngpsql driver isn't old. They've released updates to it all through version 8 and 9 so far as I know. We do some .Net work against Postgres and it seems to work for what we're doing.





Michael Gould


Intermodal Software Solutions, LLC


904-226-0978





-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Why PGSQL has no developments in the .NET area?

From: "Francisco Figueiredo Jr." francisco(at)npgsql(dot)org

Date: Mon, October 03, 2011 8:19 am

To: Rohit Coder passionate_programmer(at)hotmail(dot)com

Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org

Hi!

What usage case of Npgsql are you having performance issues?

On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 00:32, Rohit Coder

passionate_programmer(at)hotmail(dot)com wrote:

PgSQL has just one old NPGSQL driver for .NET, which is itself sluggish. The

ODBC driver works better as compared to NPGSQL, but I suspect the ODBC

driver is not the right choice for ORM framework of .NET.

I want to know whether there is any efficient .NET provider and is PGSQL

compatible with the .NET entity framework.

Regards,

Rohit.

--

Regards,

Francisco Figueiredo Jr.

Npgsql Lead Developer

http://www.npgsql.org

http://gplus.to/franciscojunior

http://fxjr.blogspot.com

http://twitter.com/franciscojunior

--

Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)

To make changes to your subscription:

http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general





Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dusan Misic 2011-10-03 16:26:00 Re: Why PGSQL has no developments in the .NET area?
Previous Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2011-10-03 16:12:33 Inconsistency: varchar is equivalent to varchar(255) and also not equivalent?