Re: Summary function for pg_buffercache

From: Melih Mutlu <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Zhang Mingli <zmlpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Summary function for pg_buffercache
Date: 2022-09-28 14:41:45
Message-ID: CAGPVpCS50ghikTv+P1k6vN8YdVZPG5vHXvB+pHCJAvOfbwhtEA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Zhang Mingli <zmlpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, 28 Eyl 2022 Çar, 17:31 tarihinde şunu
yazdı:

> Why compute usagecount_avg twice?
>

I should have removed the first one, but I think I missed it.
Nice catch.

Attached an updated version.

Thanks,
Melih

Attachment Content-Type Size
v13-0001-Added-pg_buffercache_summary-function.patch application/octet-stream 11.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-09-28 14:42:21 Re: Obsolete comment in ExecInsert()
Previous Message Zhang Mingli 2022-09-28 14:31:34 Re: Summary function for pg_buffercache