| From: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Speed up clean meson builds by ~25% |
| Date: | 2024-04-17 12:03:37 |
| Message-ID: | CAGECzQQ685HAYEe-o6EKzdeQMke1uvyuy_sezFvtVe2GxL5p8A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 at 13:41, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
>
> On 10.04.24 17:33, Tom Lane wrote:
> > The immediate question then is do we want to take Jelte's patch
> > as a way to ameliorate the pain meanwhile. I'm kind of down on
> > it, because AFAICS what would happen if you break the core
> > grammar is that (most likely) the failure would be reported
> > against ecpg first. That seems pretty confusing.
>
> Yeah that would be confusing.
How can I test if this actually happens? Because it sounds like if
that indeed happens it should be fixable fairly easily.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-04-17 12:53:40 | Re: CREATE TABLE creates a composite type corresponding to the table row, which is and is not there |
| Previous Message | walther | 2024-04-17 12:02:41 | Re: Building with meson on NixOS/nixpkgs |