| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Speed up clean meson builds by ~25% |
| Date: | 2024-04-17 11:40:58 |
| Message-ID: | 32e8bd4c-eab7-424b-977c-d09d6a29437a@eisentraut.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10.04.24 17:33, Tom Lane wrote:
> The immediate question then is do we want to take Jelte's patch
> as a way to ameliorate the pain meanwhile. I'm kind of down on
> it, because AFAICS what would happen if you break the core
> grammar is that (most likely) the failure would be reported
> against ecpg first. That seems pretty confusing.
Yeah that would be confusing.
I suppose we could just take the part of the patch that moves up preproc
among the subdirectories of ecpg, but I don't know if that by itself
would really buy anything.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-04-17 11:49:53 | Re: Building with meson on NixOS/nixpkgs |
| Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2024-04-17 11:39:14 | Re: Stack overflow issue |