Re: Reasons for postgres processes beeing killed by SIGNAL 9?

From: Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Reasons for postgres processes beeing killed by SIGNAL 9?
Date: 2012-05-19 14:42:16
Message-ID: CAFvQSYR-q_nKoCEF=X52LJdcWKuksFe3qqnLSbfiHyhoRnsfwQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi again,

We are still constantly getting postgresql processes killed by signal
9 from time to time, without any idea why or how.
Syslog seems completly clean.

In case a postgresql process would exceed some restricted resources
like file descriptors, would the kernel choose to terminate it using
SIGKILL? Are there any other common examples / occurences where
processes are terminated this way automatically?

Thank you in advance, Clemens

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message c k 2012-05-19 17:09:54 suggestion for backup
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2012-05-19 14:12:06 Re: timestamps, formatting, and internals