Re: Reasons for postgres processes beeing killed by SIGNAL 9?

From: Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Reasons for postgres processes beeing killed by SIGNAL 9?
Date: 2012-05-18 09:51:48
Message-ID: CAFvQSYSM12QCbCF9QpyUJwbaZoN+4QKam0uXgU7BFU39NYPE7Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi Steve,

> Out of memory or OOM killer?? Any such messages in system logs?

That was my first thought too - but I could't find anything indicating
an OOM event in the logs.
Usually the server only uses ~110mb out of the available 2GB assigned to it.

So if this isn't a known postgres behaviour, I guess I have to dig a
bit in vmware related issues.

Thanks, Clemens

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marti Raudsepp 2012-05-18 09:55:31 Re: Re: Is EXISTS the most efficient approach for PostgreSql to check for existence of nodes in a tree?
Previous Message Igor 2012-05-18 08:34:17 One schema per different databases