| From: | Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Cody Cutrer <cody(at)instructure(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Index on System Table |
| Date: | 2012-03-22 20:04:59 |
| Message-ID: | CAFcNs+rrEZrcnWcACwZCRGAY+dxgX9t=TFwdh+yz0XVzLgrzgg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
2012/3/21 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
>
> BTW, I experimented with that a little bit and found that the relmapper
> is not really the stumbling block, at least not after applying this
> one-line patch:
>
> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=f70f095c9096d5e2689e8d79172b37b57a84e51b
>
>
Can we back-patch it on previous versions like 9.0 and 9.1? Or exist some
reason to don't do that?
Regards,
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
>> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marti Raudsepp | 2012-03-22 21:52:49 | Re: Large Databases redux |
| Previous Message | Heiko Wundram | 2012-03-22 17:21:46 | Re: Very high memory usage on restoring dump (with plain pqsl) on pg 9.1.2 |