| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Cc: | Cody Cutrer <cody(at)instructure(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Index on System Table |
| Date: | 2012-03-22 22:09:25 |
| Message-ID: | 15508.1332454165@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fabr=EDzio_de_Royes_Mello?= <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> 2012/3/21 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
>> BTW, I experimented with that a little bit and found that the relmapper
>> is not really the stumbling block, at least not after applying this
>> one-line patch:
> Can we back-patch it on previous versions like 9.0 and 9.1? Or exist some
> reason to don't do that?
Given that the whole thing is entirely unsupported anyway, I see no
need to back-patch.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Maxim Boguk | 2012-03-22 23:34:43 | Question about warning: "invalid resource manager ID 128 at ..." on hot stanby |
| Previous Message | Marti Raudsepp | 2012-03-22 21:52:49 | Re: Large Databases redux |