Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions

From: Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions
Date: 2025-02-24 13:33:34
Message-ID: CAFY6G8dzuLXFjONX5E-TvyD5E9r21b5vp1My_nMcqdGD0VYfYw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 8:07 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
>
> This patch is now complete enough for testing, I think. As I mentioned
> earlier, I haven't updated pg_available_extensions() etc. to support the
> path, but that shouldn't prevent some testing.

To help with this patch I'm attaching a new version with the remaining TODOs
fixed and also with a new TAP test.

Thoughts?

--
Matheus Alcantara

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-extension_control_path.patch application/octet-stream 33.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2025-02-24 13:46:32 Re: psql \dh: List High-Level (Root) Tables and Indexes
Previous Message wenhui qiu 2025-02-24 13:08:06 Re: Anti join confusion