| From: | Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sadeq Dousti <msdousti(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: psql \dh: List High-Level (Root) Tables and Indexes |
| Date: | 2025-02-24 13:46:32 |
| Message-ID: | CAKAnmm+nnQiLgwm=8Od9gNzCc-ayEqK2VY5vU85oWc7Tv2qy2A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 3:07 AM Sadeq Dousti <msdousti(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> * While capitalization of N might seem arbitrary, it can be acceptable as
> it's "negating" some concept
> ...
>
> If there are no hard objections, I'll proceed with adding the N letter to
> \d commands.
>
Not strongly opposed, but "N" is a slightly odd as we already have "n" and
pg_dump uses both "n" and "N", where the latter is the inverse of the
former. But since I have no better idea at the moment, a weak +1 until more
bike shedders arrive. :)
Cheers,
Greg
P.S. On reflection, I do like having a capital letter more than a lowercase
for an exclusion case like this.
--
Crunchy Data - https://www.crunchydata.com
Enterprise Postgres Software Products & Tech Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2025-02-24 13:55:16 | Re: PATCH: warn about, and deprecate, clear text passwords |
| Previous Message | Matheus Alcantara | 2025-02-24 13:33:34 | Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions |