Re: Decimal64 and Decimal128

From: Feng Tian <ftian(at)vitessedata(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Decimal64 and Decimal128
Date: 2015-09-24 21:17:17
Message-ID: CAFWGqnucX1=5iQ+fWTKfLwFyRDFvbRSvU8ugEiBLmJXaohjZXQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Please include the actual patch as an attachment. We do not consider
> mere
> > URLs to be acceptable patch submission format, because that provides no
> > permanent record in our archives of what was submitted.
>
> I was under the impression that this was not intended as a patch
> submission.
>
>
> --
> Peter Geoghegan
>

If there is enough interest, would be great for it to go into the official
contrib dir.
Thanks,

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Feng Tian 2015-09-24 21:23:08 Re: Decimal64 and Decimal128
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-09-24 20:55:16 Re: Decimal64 and Decimal128