Re: Decimal64 and Decimal128

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Feng Tian <ftian(at)vitessedata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Decimal64 and Decimal128
Date: 2015-09-24 20:55:16
Message-ID: CAM3SWZRuKt1Sg+U1NxKtQj_KSmh2_K2yUUeBGerYagUFkGjaKA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Please include the actual patch as an attachment. We do not consider mere
> URLs to be acceptable patch submission format, because that provides no
> permanent record in our archives of what was submitted.

I was under the impression that this was not intended as a patch submission.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Feng Tian 2015-09-24 21:17:17 Re: Decimal64 and Decimal128
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-09-24 20:53:06 Re: Decimal64 and Decimal128