Re: Decimal64 and Decimal128

From: Feng Tian <ftian(at)vitessedata(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Decimal64 and Decimal128
Date: 2015-09-24 21:23:08
Message-ID: CAFWGqnt8thKTPSDZrwKsa8WZ0hTNEF0yeoSY_QSn8rH=_tnH9w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Feng Tian <ftian(at)vitessedata(dot)com> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> > Please include the actual patch as an attachment. We do not consider
>> mere
>> > URLs to be acceptable patch submission format, because that provides no
>> > permanent record in our archives of what was submitted.
>>
>> I was under the impression that this was not intended as a patch
>> submission.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Peter Geoghegan
>>
>
> If there is enough interest, would be great for it to go into the official
> contrib dir.
> Thanks,
>
>
> Second thought, the extension depends on decNumber, which is either GPL,
or ICU license. Maybe this is trouble.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2015-09-24 21:32:16 Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So!
Previous Message Feng Tian 2015-09-24 21:17:17 Re: Decimal64 and Decimal128