From: | Julien Tachoires <julmon(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Improving psql \ds |
Date: | 2012-10-08 07:49:27 |
Message-ID: | CAFEQCbEPjfgOvD9jQFih86uOoH1ZAGLfLCn+CjaP90oQOLS2NQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2012/10/8 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Julien Tachoires <julmon(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> About \ds behaviour, I think to add 2 columns :
>> - 'LastValue'
>> - 'Increment'
>
> That would make the command a great deal slower, since it would have to
> access each sequence to get that info. I don't object to adding such
> columns to \ds+, but I don't think it's a good idea to put them in the
> basic command.
Ok.
> The other problem you're going to have here is that there is in fact no
> such command as "\ds" (nor "\ds+"); rather, it's a special case of
> \dtsvi. As such, putting any relkind-specific info into the result is
> problematic. I think you're going to have to invent a different command
> if you want there to be sequence-specific columns.
Yes, that's why I plan to create a new function listSequences() and
call it from src/bin/psql/command.c :
+ /* \d* commands */
+ else if (cmd[0] == 'd')
+ {
...
+ case 's':
+ success = listSequences(pattern, show_verbose);
+ break;
Cheers,
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2012-10-08 08:05:38 | Re: Add FET to Default and Europe.txt |
Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2012-10-08 07:30:49 | Re: Bad Data back Door |