From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Julien Tachoires <julmon(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Improving psql \ds |
Date: | 2012-10-08 14:59:59 |
Message-ID: | 1263.1349708399@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Julien Tachoires <julmon(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> 2012/10/8 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>> The other problem you're going to have here is that there is in fact no
>> such command as "\ds" (nor "\ds+"); rather, it's a special case of
>> \dtsvi. As such, putting any relkind-specific info into the result is
>> problematic. I think you're going to have to invent a different command
>> if you want there to be sequence-specific columns.
> Yes, that's why I plan to create a new function listSequences() and
> call it from src/bin/psql/command.c :
> + /* \d* commands */
> + else if (cmd[0] == 'd')
> + {
> ...
> + case 's':
> + success = listSequences(pattern, show_verbose);
> + break;
No, that's not acceptable, because it will break cases such as "\dstv".
The \dxxx command namespace is already direly overloaded; I'm not sure
cramming more behaviors into it is a good idea anyway. Perhaps
something along the line of "\seqs" would be a usable substitute.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Julien Tachoires | 2012-10-08 15:02:48 | Re: Improving psql \ds |
Previous Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2012-10-08 14:57:42 | Re: [v9.3] Row-Level Security |