From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Julien Tachoires <julmon(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Improving psql \ds |
Date: | 2012-10-08 14:53:03 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob1DLjV_yWZ02p_Wt=9LgHRKaDywyWX6T2uJvux3u+MYQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:49 AM, Julien Tachoires <julmon(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 2012/10/8 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>> Julien Tachoires <julmon(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> About \ds behaviour, I think to add 2 columns :
>>> - 'LastValue'
>>> - 'Increment'
>>
>> That would make the command a great deal slower, since it would have to
>> access each sequence to get that info. I don't object to adding such
>> columns to \ds+, but I don't think it's a good idea to put them in the
>> basic command.
>
> Ok.
>
>> The other problem you're going to have here is that there is in fact no
>> such command as "\ds" (nor "\ds+"); rather, it's a special case of
>> \dtsvi. As such, putting any relkind-specific info into the result is
>> problematic. I think you're going to have to invent a different command
>> if you want there to be sequence-specific columns.
>
> Yes, that's why I plan to create a new function listSequences() and
> call it from src/bin/psql/command.c :
> + /* \d* commands */
> + else if (cmd[0] == 'd')
> + {
> ...
> + case 's':
> + success = listSequences(pattern, show_verbose);
> + break;
What happens if the user does this:
\dis
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-10-08 14:53:35 | Re: Add FET to Default and Europe.txt |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-10-08 14:42:27 | why can't plpgsql return a row-expression? |