Re: Address the bug in 041_checkpoint_at_promote.pl

From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Subject: Re: Address the bug in 041_checkpoint_at_promote.pl
Date: 2025-02-13 05:48:28
Message-ID: CAExHW5tgxdckJL5ebsgt+J-uKaEfvyiomgfbNyWosDzkLLmVDQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 5:08 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> Anyway, how did you find that? Did you see a pattern when running the
> test on a very slow machine or just from a read? That was a good
> catch.
+1. I was wondering the same.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2025-02-13 05:54:51 Re: Restrict publishing of partitioned table with a foreign table as partition
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2025-02-13 05:34:10 Re: NOT ENFORCED constraint feature