Re: Address the bug in 041_checkpoint_at_promote.pl

> > Anyway, how did you find that? Did you see a pattern when running the
> > test on a very slow machine or just from a read? That was a good
> > catch.
> +1. I was wondering the same.

I was writing a TAP test to reproduce a crash recovery issue and used
parts of 041_checkpoint_at_promote.pl. Unfortunately, my test wasn't
waiting for the desired message to appear in the log. I then realized
there was a mistake in log_contains(), which I had copied from the
existing test. After testing 041_checkpoint_at_promote.pl multiple
times to see if it worked as expected, I noticed differences in some
iterations.

Best Regards,
Nitin Jadhav
Azure Database for PostgreSQL
Microsoft

On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 11:18 AM Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 5:08 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> >
> > Anyway, how did you find that? Did you see a pattern when running the
> > test on a very slow machine or just from a read? That was a good
> > catch.
> +1. I was wondering the same.
>
>
> --
> Best Wishes,
> Ashutosh Bapat