Re: Address the bug in 041_checkpoint_at_promote.pl

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Address the bug in 041_checkpoint_at_promote.pl
Date: 2025-02-12 23:38:08
Message-ID: Z60w4MIgVDPDLgEE@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 04:50:34PM +0530, Nitin Jadhav wrote:
> I see that it's already been committed and understand that no other
> changes are needed. Thank you!

My apologies for the lack of updates here. I've looked at the whole
test again yesterday and the issue that you have reported was the only
one standing out.

Anyway, how did you find that? Did you see a pattern when running the
test on a very slow machine or just from a read? That was a good
catch.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sami Imseih 2025-02-12 23:44:20 Proposal - Allow extensions to set a Plan Identifier
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2025-02-12 23:26:53 Re: Unneeded volatile qualifier in fmgr.c