| From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Parallel VACUUM in feature matrix on website |
| Date: | 2015-09-27 19:44:58 |
| Message-ID: | CAECtzeX+rKwDjuGhA6uFvy05y_roO91j3qx02q-95Tys5S_zhA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
2015-09-27 21:39 GMT+02:00 Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>:
> On 27 September 2015 at 20:33, Peter Geoghegan
> <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > It's not really parallel VACUUM, is it? So why call it parallel VACUUM?
>
> It allows multiple vacuum processes to be initiated from vacuumdb at
> the same time (i.e. in parallel), although not for the same tables.
> What do you propose would be more appropriate?
>
>
Sounds more like a parallel vacuumdb, than a parallel VACUUM, to me :)
--
Guillaume.
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thom Brown | 2015-09-27 20:06:05 | Re: Parallel VACUUM in feature matrix on website |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-09-27 19:43:54 | Re: Parallel VACUUM in feature matrix on website |