Re: Parallel VACUUM in feature matrix on website

From: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel VACUUM in feature matrix on website
Date: 2015-09-27 19:39:27
Message-ID: CAA-aLv6kp6qa6Tu0-QaYYOsq94BLAH3mmwL0xoK8Ad=+tkb_oQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 27 September 2015 at 20:33, Peter Geoghegan
<peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> It's not really parallel VACUUM, is it? So why call it parallel VACUUM?

It allows multiple vacuum processes to be initiated from vacuumdb at
the same time (i.e. in parallel), although not for the same tables.
What do you propose would be more appropriate?

Thom

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-09-27 19:43:54 Re: Parallel VACUUM in feature matrix on website
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-09-27 19:39:21 Re: Parallel VACUUM in feature matrix on website