From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Parallel VACUUM in feature matrix on website |
Date: | 2015-09-27 20:06:05 |
Message-ID: | CAA-aLv6GP1HLQvcHo_5WWuJ9M7gxrpejwM2C71Kf81oHTe3_ag@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 27 September 2015 at 20:43, Peter Geoghegan
<peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>> It allows multiple vacuum processes to be initiated from vacuumdb at
>> the same time (i.e. in parallel), although not for the same tables.
>> What do you propose would be more appropriate?
>
> "Parallel vacuumdb jobs" seems better. I have seen cases where the
> existing wording caused confusion.
>
> I think that we will probably have actual parallel vacuum within the
> next couple of releases (probably vacuuming multiple indexes at the
> same time, using a list of TIDs in shared memory). The messaging here
> is important.
Okay, I've changed it to "Parallel vacuumdb jobs".
Thom
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-09-27 20:45:40 | Re: Parallel VACUUM in feature matrix on website |
Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2015-09-27 19:44:58 | Re: Parallel VACUUM in feature matrix on website |