Re: Truncation of mapped catalogs (whether local or shared) leads to server crash

From: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Truncation of mapped catalogs (whether local or shared) leads to server crash
Date: 2024-06-18 14:28:26
Message-ID: CAE9k0PmcmN=hJJ+W5G53+JZPgYWrWQYMa=uynY_P3ZeNQzq4bA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 7:50 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 8:10 AM Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> Executing below commands:
> >> -- set allow_system_table_mods TO on;
> >> -- truncate table pg_type;
>
> > If the operation isn't allowed without turning on
> > allow_system_table_mods, that means that doing it is probably a bad
> > idea and will probably break stuff, as happened here.
>
> Nothing good can come of truncating *any* core system catalog --- what
> do you think you'll still be able to do afterwards?
>
> I think the assertion you noticed is there because the code path gets
> traversed during REINDEX, which is an operation we do support on
> system catalogs. I have zero interest in making truncate work
> on them.
>

I agree with you on that point. How about considering a complete
restriction instead?

--
With Regards,
Ashutosh Sharma.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Maxim Orlov 2024-06-18 14:29:13 Re: Maybe don't process multi xmax in FreezeMultiXactId() if it is already marked as invalid?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2024-06-18 14:22:49 Re: CompilerWarnings task does not catch C++ warnings