From: | Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
Cc: | Jonathan Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Accidental inclusion of core team on funds policy? |
Date: | 2023-10-09 13:31:16 |
Message-ID: | CADK3HHLfyLF5+0CP2fq-BvohMPwjR0acxf05n_LQ7s+THXKjRQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Dave Cramer
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 09:29, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
> > On 9 Oct 2023, at 15:25, Jonathan Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> >
> > On 2023-10-09 08:48, Dave Cramer wrote:
> >> On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 08:46, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
> >>> I happened to notice what seems like a copy/paste error in the funds
> group
> >>> policy document on the website. The first para on the page explains
> Core
> >>> Team
> >>> membership which seems incorrect as they are separate entities.
> >>> https://www.postgresql.org/about/policies/funds-group/
> >>> Shouldn't we do something like the attached?
> >> +1 from me
> >
> > -1. This is part of the charter that was sent to SPI. Please do not
> > modify it.
>
> Fair enough, but should it really be there or is it something which should
> be
> changed at some point? Right now it implies that the Funds group reports
> to
> the Core Team, or that the Core Team has influence on the Funds group,
> which
> AFAIK isn't correct.
>
> Why is the Core Team membership mentioned there ?
Dave
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2023-10-09 13:35:26 | Re: Accidental inclusion of core team on funds policy? |
Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2023-10-09 13:29:20 | Re: Accidental inclusion of core team on funds policy? |