Re: Accidental inclusion of core team on funds policy?

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Jonathan Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Accidental inclusion of core team on funds policy?
Date: 2023-10-09 13:29:20
Message-ID: B10F3C64-C50A-4BE7-91E6-55401BFE36F1@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

> On 9 Oct 2023, at 15:25, Jonathan Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>
> On 2023-10-09 08:48, Dave Cramer wrote:
>> On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 08:46, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>>> I happened to notice what seems like a copy/paste error in the funds group
>>> policy document on the website. The first para on the page explains Core
>>> Team
>>> membership which seems incorrect as they are separate entities.
>>> https://www.postgresql.org/about/policies/funds-group/
>>> Shouldn't we do something like the attached?
>> +1 from me
>
> -1. This is part of the charter that was sent to SPI. Please do not
> modify it.

Fair enough, but should it really be there or is it something which should be
changed at some point? Right now it implies that the Funds group reports to
the Core Team, or that the Core Team has influence on the Funds group, which
AFAIK isn't correct.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2023-10-09 13:31:16 Re: Accidental inclusion of core team on funds policy?
Previous Message Jonathan Katz 2023-10-09 13:25:33 Re: Accidental inclusion of core team on funds policy?