Re: Working toward a JTA 1.0.1 Compliant XADataSource

There's no technical reason as to why it would not work.

The project has used this layout for as long as I can remember. If we were
to change it for this patch why not change it for every patch ?

I can get the project to build in eclipse and IDEA, I haven't tried
netbeans, but I see no reason why it wouldn't work.

Dave

Dave Cramer

dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> On 03/01/2013 10:16 PM, Dave Cramer wrote:
>
> Yes, moving everything to src will not work for the project.
>
> Could you also tell _why_ it would not work ?
>
> Will it break some other IDEs expectations ?
>
> Hannu
>
>
> Dave
>
> Dave Cramer
>
> dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
> http://www.credativ.ca
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Bryan Varner <bvarner(at)polarislabs(dot)com>wrote:
>
>> Since it's been nearly two weeks since my first message, I thought I'd
>> send an update on where we are with our XA reimplementation.
>>
>> Our production environment (GlassFish) is standing on it's own two feet
>> with our XA implementation.
>> https://github.com/polarislabs/pgjdbc/tree/POLARIS_XA
>>
>> We're seeing decent performance and (mostly) reliable operation.
>>
>> We're hammering out a few obscure race condition bugs with regards to
>> threaded invocations of shared XAResources & the connection handle usage. I
>> expect we'll have these fixed and in our github repo by Monday.
>>
>> We are passing all the existing XA pgjdbc tests, as well as the expanded
>> ones we've produced. The driver operates with and without interleaving (you
>> can disable the extra physical connection allocation with a property).
>>
>> Our XA implementation also passes the JBoss TM (version 4.17) JDBC (XA
>> mode!) test suite.
>> https://github.com/jbosstm/narayana/tree/4.17
>>
>>
>> I know there were some complaints earlier in the thread that we moved all
>> the source code into a 'src' directory. We did this to support IDE
>> environments which don't like having the source folder be the same as the
>> root of the project (NetBeans comes to mind). We also fixed the build.xml
>> to _completely_ respect the property it already had for the source
>> directory location.
>>
>> If the src directory and build changes are going to be an obstacle to
>> getting this work accepted upstream, now would be a good time to tell me.
>>
>> If there's no hope of having this accepted upstream, now would be a good
>> time to tell me.
>>
>> Again, I invite anyone to suggest changes, test it out, and report back
>> what you find.
>>
>> Regards,
>> -Bryan Varner
>>
>>
>> ----------------
>> Senior Developer
>> POLARIS Laboratories
>>
>>
>>
>> On 02/20/2013 05:44 PM, Florent Guillaume wrote:
>>
>>> For what it's worth Bryan I thing what you're doing is a good thing,
>>> this makes the implementation more robust and I'll be testing what you
>>> have as soon as I find the time.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Florent
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
>>
>
>
>