Re: Working toward a JTA 1.0.1 Compliant XADataSource

On 03/01/2013 10:16 PM, Dave Cramer wrote:
> Yes, moving everything to src will not work for the project.
Could you also tell _why_ it would not work ?

Will it break some other IDEs expectations ?

Hannu
>
> Dave
>
> Dave Cramer
>
> dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
> http://www.credativ.ca
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Bryan Varner <bvarner(at)polarislabs(dot)com
> <mailto:bvarner(at)polarislabs(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> Since it's been nearly two weeks since my first message, I thought
> I'd send an update on where we are with our XA reimplementation.
>
> Our production environment (GlassFish) is standing on it's own two
> feet with our XA implementation.
> https://github.com/polarislabs/pgjdbc/tree/POLARIS_XA
>
> We're seeing decent performance and (mostly) reliable operation.
>
> We're hammering out a few obscure race condition bugs with regards
> to threaded invocations of shared XAResources & the connection
> handle usage. I expect we'll have these fixed and in our github
> repo by Monday.
>
> We are passing all the existing XA pgjdbc tests, as well as the
> expanded ones we've produced. The driver operates with and without
> interleaving (you can disable the extra physical connection
> allocation with a property).
>
> Our XA implementation also passes the JBoss TM (version 4.17) JDBC
> (XA mode!) test suite.
> https://github.com/jbosstm/narayana/tree/4.17
>
>
> I know there were some complaints earlier in the thread that we
> moved all the source code into a 'src' directory. We did this to
> support IDE environments which don't like having the source folder
> be the same as the root of the project (NetBeans comes to mind).
> We also fixed the build.xml to _completely_ respect the property
> it already had for the source directory location.
>
> If the src directory and build changes are going to be an obstacle
> to getting this work accepted upstream, now would be a good time
> to tell me.
>
> If there's no hope of having this accepted upstream, now would be
> a good time to tell me.
>
> Again, I invite anyone to suggest changes, test it out, and report
> back what you find.
>
> Regards,
> -Bryan Varner
>
>
> ----------------
> Senior Developer
> POLARIS Laboratories
>
>
>
> On 02/20/2013 05:44 PM, Florent Guillaume wrote:
>
> For what it's worth Bryan I thing what you're doing is a good
> thing,
> this makes the implementation more robust and I'll be testing
> what you
> have as soon as I find the time.
>
> Thanks,
> Florent
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> <mailto:pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
>
>