Re: RFC: Make new versions of pgjdbc Java8+

On 3 April 2017 at 16:01, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht(at)8kdata(dot)com> wrote:

>
>
> On 03/04/17 21:15, rado(at)edno(dot)moe wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone.
>> On 2017-04-03 21:58, Stephen Frost wrote:
>>
>>> Dave,
>>>
>>> * Dave Cramer (pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com) wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3 April 2017 at 14:33, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht(at)8kdata(dot)com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> Quick eyeball of the latest two versions shows significant download of
>>>> jre6, and a scary data of 1208 jre7. I wonder what project is using
>>>> that?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Chef.
>>>
>>> All but ~4000 of those hits were by either "Chef Client" or "Chef
>>> Knife", most of which were, unsurprisingly, just 304's ("not modified").
>>>
>>
>> From 100 000 downloads?
>> This link shows which other POMs are referring to 9.4.1208.jre7:
>> http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.postgresql/postgresql/
>> 9.4.1208.jre7/usages
>> Keep in mind that I don't know how reliable is this data, but Clojure and
>> Spring Boot are quite popular projects.
>>
>
> This doesn't seem to happen with current version 42:
>
> http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.postgresql/postgresql/
> 42.0.0.jre7/usages (not used so far)
>
> BTW, description of this version of the driver, according to
> http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.postgresql/postgresql/42.0.0.jre7
> is:
>
> "Java JDBC 4.2 (JRE 8+) driver for PostgreSQL database"
>
> LOL!
>
>
>
guess I'll have to fix that

Dave Cramer

davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
www.postgresintl.com