Re: RFC: Make new versions of pgjdbc Java8+

On 03/04/17 21:15, rado(at)edno(dot)moe wrote:
> Hi everyone.
> On 2017-04-03 21:58, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> Dave,
>>
>> * Dave Cramer (pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com) wrote:
>>> On 3 April 2017 at 14:33, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht(at)8kdata(dot)com>
>>> wrote:
>>> Quick eyeball of the latest two versions shows significant download of
>>> jre6, and a scary data of 1208 jre7. I wonder what project is using
>>> that?
>>
>> Chef.
>>
>> All but ~4000 of those hits were by either "Chef Client" or "Chef
>> Knife", most of which were, unsurprisingly, just 304's ("not modified").
>
> From 100 000 downloads?
> This link shows which other POMs are referring to 9.4.1208.jre7:
> http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.postgresql/postgresql/9.4.1208.jre7/usages
> Keep in mind that I don't know how reliable is this data, but Clojure
> and Spring Boot are quite popular projects.

This doesn't seem to happen with current version 42:

http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.postgresql/postgresql/42.0.0.jre7/usages
(not used so far)

BTW, description of this version of the driver, according to
http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.postgresql/postgresql/42.0.0.jre7 is:

"Java JDBC 4.2 (JRE 8+) driver for PostgreSQL database"

LOL!

Álvaro

--

Álvaro Hernández Tortosa

-----------
<8K>data