Re: RFC: Make new versions of pgjdbc Java8+

From: rado(at)edno(dot)moe
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht(at)8kdata(dot)com>, Daniel Migowski <dmigowski(at)ikoffice(dot)de>, John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RFC: Make new versions of pgjdbc Java8+
Date: 2017-04-03 19:15:29
Message-ID: 0fccb64d158572ceefd8f8da0990947a@edno.moe
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Hi everyone.
On 2017-04-03 21:58, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Dave,
>
> * Dave Cramer (pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com) wrote:
>> On 3 April 2017 at 14:33, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht(at)8kdata(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>> Quick eyeball of the latest two versions shows significant download of
>> jre6, and a scary data of 1208 jre7. I wonder what project is using
>> that?
>
> Chef.
>
> All but ~4000 of those hits were by either "Chef Client" or "Chef
> Knife", most of which were, unsurprisingly, just 304's ("not
> modified").

From 100 000 downloads?
This link shows which other POMs are referring to 9.4.1208.jre7:
http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.postgresql/postgresql/9.4.1208.jre7/usages
Keep in mind that I don't know how reliable is this data, but Clojure
and Spring Boot are quite popular projects.

> There were 241 actual downloads, all from Chef Client or Chef Knife
> again and from just as recent as a few days ago.
>
> That was from 93 distinct IPs.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message rado 2017-04-03 19:34:44 Re: RFC: Make new versions of pgjdbc Java8+
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2017-04-03 18:58:44 Re: RFC: Make new versions of pgjdbc Java8+