From: | Ken Tanzer <ken(dot)tanzer(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL License |
Date: | 2019-09-19 04:43:25 |
Message-ID: | CAD3a31WUdG0bvAnZfH8==i8d2H2DrGaxgXPa2BEsoENJpKHsqQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-docs pgsql-general |
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 6:35 PM Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On 9/18/19 8:26 PM, Ken Tanzer wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 5:55 PM Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On 9/18/19 6:03 PM, Ken Tanzer wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 3:20 PM Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> Charging for *installing* PostgreSQL is not the same as charging for
>>> PostgreSQL.
>>>
>>> Bottom line: you charge for *services** you provide* not for software
>>> that other people provide.
>>>
>>> That's just really not true. There is nothing that prohibits you from
>> selling Postgresql. I mean, it's not a great business model because you
>> can get it for free, but there's nothing that stops you from doing it.
>>
>>
>> Quoting Adrian Klaver in this thread from about eight hours ago: "You
>> cannot (legitimately) charge the pharmacist for any part PostgresQL."
>>
>>
>>
> Actually that's Rob Sargent you're quoting. Adrian took issue with that
> statement, as do I. While Google isn't finding me anything that says
> "Yes, you can sell Postgresql," here are a few points:
>
>
> - Point to anything in the license wording that says you can't charge
> money to distribute Postgresql. You can't.
>
>
> - Even software licensed under the GPL, which is a considerably more
> restrictive license, can be sold. The free software folks consider the
> right to sell as one of the freedoms associated with free software. [1]
>
>
> - The Postgresql license page says it is "a liberal Open Source
> license, similar to the BSD or MIT licenses." [2] The MIT license itself
> explicitly states that it grants rights to "sell copies of the software."
>
>
> How do you sell what you don't own?
>
>
You can do so because the owners have granted you the right to do so. They
were just good enough to not charge you money for it.
--
AGENCY Software
A Free Software data system
By and for non-profits
*http://agency-software.org/ <http://agency-software.org/>*
*https://demo.agency-software.org/client
<https://demo.agency-software.org/client>*
ken(dot)tanzer(at)agency-software(dot)org
(253) 245-3801
Subscribe to the mailing list
<agency-general-request(at)lists(dot)sourceforge(dot)net?body=subscribe> to
learn more about AGENCY or
follow the discussion.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Priancka Chatz | 2019-09-19 04:48:39 | PgLogical ERROR: table is already being synchronized |
Previous Message | Ron | 2019-09-19 01:35:21 | Re: PostgreSQL License |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron | 2019-09-19 05:04:51 | Re: PostgreSQL License |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-09-19 04:20:49 | Re: Is it typo of connection_name? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mitar | 2019-09-19 04:51:18 | Automatically parsing in-line composite types |
Previous Message | David Steele | 2019-09-19 02:30:40 | Re: pgbackrest - question about restoring cluster to a new cluster on same server |