Re: Is it typo of connection_name?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: egashira(dot)yusuke(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is it typo of connection_name?
Date: 2019-09-19 04:20:49
Message-ID: 20190919042049.GE22307@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 10:49:14AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Good catch. If you look at the code (ecpg.trailer), connection_object
> refers to the name of the parameter, while connection_name refers to
> "AS connection_object" as a whole. So it seems to me that the
> intention is to use connection_object in the synopsis of the docs.
> Any thoughts from others?

Actually, looking around we use connection_name for other commands
like EXEC SQL or DISCONNECT, so renaming connection_object to
connection_name makes the documentation more consistent. And done.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ken Tanzer 2019-09-19 04:43:25 Re: PostgreSQL License
Previous Message Ron 2019-09-19 01:35:21 Re: PostgreSQL License