| From: | Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Schema version management |
| Date: | 2012-07-05 17:06:50 |
| Message-ID: | CAC_2qU9ztQbX6Dg_ynomar1hNy_qcTuM3PHvyk29LzemdqzB5A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:57 PM, David E. Wheeler <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> wrote:
> On Jul 5, 2012, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>> No they are not necessarily one logical unit. You could have a bunch of
>> functions called, say, "equal" which have pretty much nothing to do with
>> each other, since they refer to different types.
>>
>> +1 from me for putting one function definition per file.
>
> +1 for an option (I prefer one file for my projects, but might need multiple files for other projects).
-1
I'd rather have the few overloaded-functions in one file (hopefully
with deterministic ordering) and a sane, simple filename, than have
every function in every database in a separate file with some strange
mess in the filename that makes me cringe every time I see it.
a.
--
Aidan Van Dyk Create like a god,
aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca command like a king,
http://www.highrise.ca/ work like a slave.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2012-07-05 17:43:33 | Re: waitpid in pg_basebackup |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-07-05 17:05:30 | Re: User-Id Tracking when Portal was started |