Re: Schema version management

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Schema version management
Date: 2012-07-05 16:57:52
Message-ID: 1901D0C8-A74F-4BCF-A7BF-9BD58324D2F6@justatheory.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jul 5, 2012, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> No they are not necessarily one logical unit. You could have a bunch of
> functions called, say, "equal" which have pretty much nothing to do with
> each other, since they refer to different types.
>
> +1 from me for putting one function definition per file.

+1 for an option (I prefer one file for my projects, but might need multiple files for other projects).

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-07-05 17:01:25 Re: waitpid in pg_basebackup
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2012-07-05 16:41:38 Re: enhanced error fields