| From: | Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits |
| Date: | 2024-09-04 08:49:32 |
| Message-ID: | CACG=ezbye4g_ERNqE=gBcvQ0YypRaVENhNUu8xrs4PL12UdnUA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 3 Sept 2024 at 16:32, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> I don't think you need to maintain CATALOG_VERSION_NO change in your
> patch for the exact reason you have mentioned: patch will get conflict
> each time CATALOG_VERSION_NO is advanced. It's responsibility of
> committer to advance CATALOG_VERSION_NO when needed.
>
OK, I got it. My intention here was to help to test the patch. If someone
wants to have a
look at the patch, he won't need to make changes in the code. In the next
iteration, I'll
remove CATALOG_VERSION_NO version change.
--
Best regards,
Maxim Orlov.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | jian he | 2024-09-04 08:57:00 | Re: Add memory/disk usage for WindowAgg nodes in EXPLAIN |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-09-04 08:48:10 | Re: list of acknowledgments for PG17 |