Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits

From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits
Date: 2024-09-03 13:32:46
Message-ID: CAPpHfduczcop9s6gKUpLGgFUe2y4ERGMJx6SS6Kp+s-kQPwMjg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:30 PM Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Here is rebase. Apparently I'll have to do it often, since the CATALOG_VERSION_NO changed in the patch.

I don't think you need to maintain CATALOG_VERSION_NO change in your
patch for the exact reason you have mentioned: patch will get conflict
each time CATALOG_VERSION_NO is advanced. It's responsibility of
committer to advance CATALOG_VERSION_NO when needed.

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jakub Wartak 2024-09-03 13:37:24 Re: Set log_lock_waits=on by default
Previous Message Maxim Orlov 2024-09-03 13:30:10 Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits