From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: list of acknowledgments for PG17 |
Date: | 2024-09-04 08:48:10 |
Message-ID: | 8cddc363-f9f5-44c5-928f-42565e02de9e@eisentraut.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 03.09.24 19:59, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> I've done a small check of the list (search for first names in the
> document), and found the following curiosities:
>
> I see various cases where what seem to be names with Chinese origin are
> styled differently between this list and the feature list. Specifically,
> "Acknowledged", vs "Feature List":
>
> "Mingli Zhang", vs "Zhang Mingli"
> "Zhijie Hou", vs "Hou Zhijie" (cc-ed)
> "Zongliang Quan", vs " Quan Zongliang"
>
> I don't know if one order is preferred over the other, but it seems
> inconsistent. Hou, do you have more info on this?
The list of acknowledgments consistently uses given name followed by
family name. I suspect the release notes are not as rigid about that.
> Next, I noticed some other inconsistent names:
>
> "Hubert Lubaczewski", vs "Hubert Depesz Lubaczewski"
> "Paul Jungwirth", vs "Paul A. Jungwirth"
In some cases like that, I default to using the name variant that was
used in past release notes, so it's consistent over time.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Maxim Orlov | 2024-09-04 08:49:32 | Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits |
Previous Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2024-09-04 08:47:11 | Re: Add parallel columns for seq scan and index scan on pg_stat_all_tables and _indexes |