From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
Cc: | hanefi(dot)onaldi(at)microsoft(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Broken link in pgcrypto documentation |
Date: | 2024-02-13 19:33:29 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEzOsYVQdqUPxwFhUZqkzTdn1dj1+mUF+cONKyETf+TcYQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 7:12 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>
> > On 12 Feb 2024, at 13:55, PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> >
> > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> >
> > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/pgcrypto.html
> > Description:
> >
> > I was going through the links in pgcrypto documentation and I realized that
> > one of the links at Useful Reading section do not work.
>
> Thanks for the report!
>
> However, I wonder if we aren't better off removing the "Useful Reading" section
> altogether? The field of crypto is continuously advancing and keeping a stale
> 10+ year old list of links is unlikely to provide more insights than what more
> curated sites can do.
+1. I don't think it's the job of a postgres contrib module to maintain that.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-02-13 19:42:36 | Re: Broken link in pgcrypto documentation |
Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2024-02-13 18:11:57 | Re: Broken link in pgcrypto documentation |