> On 12 Feb 2024, at 13:55, PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/pgcrypto.html
> Description:
>
> I was going through the links in pgcrypto documentation and I realized that
> one of the links at Useful Reading section do not work.
Thanks for the report!
However, I wonder if we aren't better off removing the "Useful Reading" section
altogether? The field of crypto is continuously advancing and keeping a stale
10+ year old list of links is unlikely to provide more insights than what more
curated sites can do.
--
Daniel Gustafsson