From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Lenz Grimmer <lenz(at)grimmer(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Adding Oracle Linux to the Linux Download pages |
Date: | 2013-12-27 16:26:09 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEzBLV0ZP=jUNEA0g8zQ2y4rpAxJ3oat6TOab+Cgrr7zYw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Lenz Grimmer <lenz(at)grimmer(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi Magnus,
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>wrote:
>
>
>> Does Oracle Linux use the same version numbering? Right now it's
>> "RHEL/CentOS/SL 5" - is that equivalent of "Oracle Linux 5", and
>> "RHEL/CentOS/SL 6" is equivalent of "Oracle Linux 6"?
>>
>
> Yes, that's correct - the major version numbers and the respective update
> releases of Oracle Linux are equivalent to upstream RHEL.
>
>
>> What's the typical abbreviation used for Oracle Linux? OL?
>>
>
> Yes, even though the long variant is preferred. It's definitely *not*
> "OEL" or "Unbreakable Linux" - these brand names have been obsoleted more
> than three years ago.
>
Yeah, we don't really have space for the long variant in the version list.
We abbreviate with RHEL and SL there already, so we should do the same here.
I have pushed an update with this information which should hit the website
within an hour. Reviews are appreciated, as I changed some other things
around as well to make things more clear (for example, trying to
consistently refer to things as "RedHat Family" of distributions).
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2013-12-28 17:35:33 | Retiring the smalle/larger |
Previous Message | Lenz Grimmer | 2013-12-27 15:56:50 | Re: Adding Oracle Linux to the Linux Download pages |