| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Regina Obe <lr(at)pcorp(dot)us>, Rajeev Bhatta <techie(dot)rajeev(at)yahoo(dot)in>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Let's Do the CoC Right |
| Date: | 2016-01-22 19:44:03 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevExMcu1yCHA4axnbisHLOWzMmwyL+_u5GibO+n4sytr+5g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 8:37 PM, David E. Wheeler <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Jan 22, 2016, at 11:28 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>
> > Regardless whether it's true or not (to which I cannot speak), surely
> statements like that would violate *both* the contributor covenant *and*
> the CoC suggested by others.
>
> It may well violate the Contributor Covenant (my apologies, I was out of
> line), but not the current draft of the CoC, IME. Why? Because that’s just
> my opinion, and the CoC draft formally recognizes my right to have an
> “opposing view”.
>
Are you really saying this does not violate "* Participants must ensure
that their language and actions are free
of personal attacks and disparaging personal remarks."?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John R Pierce | 2016-01-22 19:44:58 | Re: Let's Do the CoC Right |
| Previous Message | Geoff Winkless | 2016-01-22 19:40:13 | Re: Let's Do the CoC Right |