Re: Let's Do the CoC Right

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Regina Obe <lr(at)pcorp(dot)us>, Rajeev Bhatta <techie(dot)rajeev(at)yahoo(dot)in>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Let's Do the CoC Right
Date: 2016-01-22 19:37:47
Message-ID: 1416AF09-17A1-4720-AE31-7B87D7CA280B@justatheory.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Jan 22, 2016, at 11:28 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:

> Regardless whether it's true or not (to which I cannot speak), surely statements like that would violate *both* the contributor covenant *and* the CoC suggested by others.

It may well violate the Contributor Covenant (my apologies, I was out of line), but not the current draft of the CoC, IME. Why? Because that’s just my opinion, and the CoC draft formally recognizes my right to have an “opposing view”.

Best,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Geoff Winkless 2016-01-22 19:40:13 Re: Let's Do the CoC Right
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2016-01-22 19:28:13 Re: Let's Do the CoC Right