Re: Postgres 9.3 tuning advice

From: Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>
To: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
Cc: "dushy *EXTERN*" <dushyanth(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres 9.3 tuning advice
Date: 2014-08-13 11:58:40
Message-ID: CABRT9RAyLHYKJuJRTBwccZu=jGe6_UgzWs+2sd4YtEyp8tZSdA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> wrote:
> Set wal_buffers to 16MB so that a whole WAL segment will fit.

No need, wal_buffers is automatically tuned now. If your
shared_buffers is 512MB or larger, wal_buffers will be 16MB.

Regards,
Marti

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2014-08-13 16:23:17 Re: Database block lifecycle
Previous Message Jimmy Thrasibule 2014-08-13 11:42:28 Re: PostgreSQL as a triple store